Ingmar Bergman, Werner Herzog, Stanley Kubrick, Francis Ford Coppola, Ridley Scott, Andrei Tarkovsky, Federico Fellini, Akira Kurosawa, William Shakes

(Like any philosophy that Mihajlo Bugarinovic writes...) All the bibliographies mentioned in the philosophy's title, as the relative, the relative bibliography and the rational problem of the "limit" as the contradiction, are Nietzschean, as the best great philosopher of his philosophy to begin with. How can the rational be rational without being so? (Etc...)

Just kidding... The self-conscious-book is back to the traditional forms of the self-conscious. What was the original "German-self-consciousness" of Bugarinovic's philosophy, now, for the first time, making it possible, to think a relative "for-itself" of the "in-itself-bibliography" of his philosophy? Mihajlo Bugarinovic, as a rule, as the very first rule, of his philosophy itself, never reveals the bibliography of his philosophy! (As to what is so suddenly original about his philosophy...) The philosophy does have the next progress! And that it is all done discretely. As if as the discrete logic of his philosophy...

His philosophy is always the Einstein-IQ-contradiction! How can philosophy be Einstein-smart? Which is the basic question of Bugarinovic's philosophy... Something like the most opposite talents (analytic philosophy) had to include, so as to exclude, as a discrete analytic-philosophy-logic that is itself! Is the discrete bibliography, or any, while at it, the discrete apolitical symbolic exchange of his philosophy? Does Bugarinovic's Einstein-IQ exchange with his philosophy's bibliography? (And so on...) The mystery was always the unknown of the left-wing of his philosophy! Except, he writes a right-wing philosophy! (It is the philosophy's catch/the-unknown!)